HomeHome Gibson Dunn LoginLogin
PracticesPractices LawyersLawyers OfficesOffices DiversityDiversity Our StoryOur Story Pro BonoPro Bono CareersCareers Firms NewsFirms News Firms NewsPublications

Michael Sitzman

Home > Lawyers > Michael Sitzman
Michael SitzmanMichael Sitzman
Partner
T: +1 415.393.8221
F: +1 415.374.8454
555 Mission Street
Suite 3000
San Francisco, CA 94105-0921
USA

Michael Sitzman is a member of the firm's Intellectual Property and Life Science Practice Groups.  Mr. Sitzman has extensive litigation experience in the pharmaceutical and biotechnology fields; he has handled many high-profile cases for Johnson & Johnson, Novo Nordisk, Merck Serono, Alza and Medicis.  Mr. Sitzman represents brand-name pharmaceutical companies in ANDA litigation and advising on all facets of the Hatch-Waxman Act.  Mr. Sitzman was the chief architect of the litigation strategy for Novo Nordisk that culminated in the Supreme Court’s first case involving a substantive provision of the Hatch-Waxman Act.  Mr. Sitzman also represents a broad array of biotechnology companies in high stakes patent litigation involving recombinant DNA technology, antisense technology, protein synthesis and regulation, and immunological markers.
 
Mr. Sitzman received a Bachelor of Science degree from the University of California at Davis in the field of molecular genetics.  Before becoming an attorney, he worked at the U.C. Davis plant genetics laboratory and Biogenex Labs, combining the fields of immunology, histology and general chemistry.  Mr. Sitzman earned his Juris Doctor, with distinction, from University of the Pacific in 1991, where he was elected Order of the Coif.

Mr. Sitzman is a member of the State Bar of California and is registered to practice before the United States Patent and Trademark Office.  He is admitted to all Federal and State courts in California , the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit and the United States Supreme Court.  Mr. Sitzman regularly appears pro hac vice in the District Courts of New Jersey, Delaware, Maryland and the Southern District of New York.  Mr. Sitzman is also an active member of the Federal Circuit Bar Association and speaks regularly at PLI and ACI conferences on issues of biotechnology and pharmaceutical patent law.

Select Representative Matters

  • Medicis v. GlaxoSmithKline & Stiefel (W.D. Tex. 2012, D.N.J. 2012) – patent litigation against 505(b)(2) competitor using the patented formulation for Ziana® product.
  • Medicis v. Actavis (D. Del. 2012) – ANDA litigation against generic applicant for combination clindamycin phosphate/tretinoin topical gel for dermatological applications.
  • Novo Nordisk v. Caraco Labs & Sun Pharmaceutical (E.D. Mich. 2009, Fed. Cir. 2010 & Supreme Court 2011) – litigation and appeals concerning the change in use code narrative associated with Novo Nordisk’s Prandin® product.
  • Novo Nordisk v. Caraco, Sun, Mylan, Paddock, Sandoz & Aurobindo, (E.D. Mich. 20011 & 2012, D.N.J. 2009, D. Minn. 2011, Fed. Cir. 2012) – ANDA litigation against generic applicants for repaglinide for the treatment of Type 2 diabetes when used in combination with metformin.
  • Novo Nordisk v. Actavis, Sandoz & Lupin (S.D.N.Y. 2011) - ANDA litigation against generic applicants for the single dose combination product repaglinide/metformin for the treatment of Type 2 diabetes.
  • Isis Pharmaceutical v. Santaris Pharma A/S (S.D. Cal. 2012) – defense of patent infringement allegations arising out of the development of antisense oligonucleotides (LNAs) for the treatment of diseases and medical conditions.
  • Biogen IDEC MA v. Merck Serono (D.N.J. 2011) – defense of patent infringement allegations arising out of the production of interferon-β in CHO cells under the biologics license granted by FDA.
  • In re: Ditropan Litigation (N.D. Cal. 2008) – defense of antitrust claims arising out of ANDA litigation concerning generic oxybutynin for the treatment urological disorders.
  • Thoratec v. Bodycote (N.D. Cal. 2004) – defense of patent infringement allegations concerning the biocompatible coating used in cardiovascular implantable devices.
  • C.R. Bard v. AHI Cardiovascular Surgeons, Inc. (D. Ariz.) – patent litigation arising out of inventorship and ownership claims to original patented stent technology.
  • Impra, Inc. v. Endomed (D. Ariz.) – defense of patent infringement and trade secret misappropriation allegations arising out of the design of polytetraflouroetheylene (PTFE) vascular grafts.

PRACTICES

EDUCATION

  • University of the Pacific, 1991
    Juris Doctor
  • University of California - Davis, 1986
    Bachelor of Science

ADMISSIONS

  • California Bar

RECENT PUBLICATIONS

News Search
Lawyers Entire Site
Submit
Site Map Attorney Advertisement Legal Notices Safe Harbor Privacy Policy Contact Us