Environmental Litigation and Mass Tort

Overview

The Environmental Litigation and Mass Tort Practice Group represents clients in all environmental and mass tort litigation matters.  The group's lawyers also provide counsel in connection with transactional concerns such as ongoing regulatory compliance, legislative activities and environmental due diligence. 

Chambers USA 2016 ranked Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher in Tier 1 for Environment in California.  Law360 named the firm a 2014 Practice Group of the Year in the Environmental category; Practice Groups of the Year were selected for their ability to come through for their clients in 2014, "sealing the big deals and winning the high-stakes suits."  And The National Law Journal named Gibson Dunn the Washington, D.C. Litigation Department of the Year for Mass Torts in its 2014 competition.   

Specifically, our practice includes:

  • Toxic tort
  • Class actions
  • Enforcement defense
  • Rulemaking challenges
  • Climate change and Clean Air Act
  • Cost recovery
  • Regulatory and compliance counseling
  • CEQA/NEPA
  • ​​​​Due diligence 

We work with clients in a wide variety of industries that include:

  • Oil and gas
  • Electronics
  • Defense
  • Pulp and paper
  • Agriculture and land development
  • Automobile and general manufacturing
  • Lending
  • Retailing
  • Mining  

For more than 30 years Gibson Dunn has provided  counsel on the complete range of legal issues and challenges that arise in environmental and mass tort areas.  Our group's members represent clients in civil and criminal litigation before U.S. federal and state courts as well as administrative agencies.  The lawyers on our team have been involved in a number of high-profile, precedent-setting matters leading to published decisions that affect or control the interpretation of applicable laws.  We are also active in counseling our clients about various forms of alternative dispute resolution. 

Environmental and mass tort litigation, like other commercial litigation, benefits from aggressive discovery and early, targeted motion practice to help defeat or at least define and narrow claims.  Once claims are narrowed and ambiguity in claims is eliminated, settlement is often significantly easier.  We have been successful in applying this approach to cases involving both government and nongovernment litigants.