Industries
Insurance and Reinsurance
Gibson Dunn’s Insurance and Reinsurance practice stands out for its strategic expertise and proven success in complex, high-value disputes.
Overview
Gibson Dunn is well known as a litigation powerhouse with vast insurance-industry expertise.
For decades, we have litigated game-changing cases for some of the world’s largest insurers and created precedential law in federal and state courts across the country.
Our insurance clients turn to us for cases of national importance, including existential threats to their business or industry. These cases have involved significant bad faith exposures, challenges to business and pricing models, allegations of discrimination in underwriting and claims processes, and the interpretation of policy language affecting clients on a book-of-business basis.
Gibson Dunn’s expertise is both broad and deep, as the firm litigates disputes affecting a wide range of insurance products, including general liability, property, health, life, auto, and workers compensation. Our insurance specialists are accomplished class action, trial, and appellate lawyers who have litigated matters to successful conclusions worldwide. We have acted as national coordinating counsel for insurers in a variety of disputes, establishing efficient procedures for early evaluation and cost-effective resolution, whether through carefully considered settlement, dispositive motion, or a successful jury verdict.
Gibson Dunn also plays a central role in efforts to limit punitive damage awards, both legislatively and judicially. In addition to lobbying and educational campaigns, we have pursued these efforts in U.S. state and federal courts, including the U.S. Supreme Court. We are proud of our expertise in defending punitive damage claims and have successfully tried many to defense verdicts.
“Boasting vast insurance-industry expertise, the insurance practice at Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP stands out in litigation, offering invaluable experience representing some of the world’s largest insurers across a vast array of sectors”
Legal 500 U.S.
Experience
Recent representations include:
- Obtained first-of-its-kind California federal court ruling and Ninth Circuit affirmance holding that our client had no duty to defend opioid distributor because state/local governments’ increased costs from of opioid epidemic were not an “accident.”
- Obtained published Ninth Circuit affirmance of the first COVID-19 business interruption case to be heard by that court, in Mudpie v. Travelers.
- Won summary judgment in Washington state putative class action seeking COVID-19 business interruption losses and obtained seminal Washington Supreme Court decision affirming judgment, Hill & Stout v. Mutual of Enumclaw.
- Obtained favorable summary judgment ruling for the member company of a major carrier as to settlement allocation and duty to defend issues, leading to successful resolution of a long-standing coverage reimbursement dispute in the New York State Commercial Division, National Union v. Fresenius Medical Care Holdings.
Recent representations include:
- Successfully represented an insurer in an interlocutory appeal before the Ninth Circuit, arguing that the trial court had properly denied a motion to certify a class of auto insurance policyholders challenging how the insurer valued claims for “totaled” vehicles.
- Served as national strategic trial and appellate counsel in multiple state-specific cost-of-insurance class actions, including securing summary judgment in Washington and California actions.
- Defeated class certification and obtained dismissal in putative class action challenging the company’s utilization review of inpatient mental health services.
- Defeated class certification of a putative class of more than 100,000 policyholders in a case challenging core underwriting and pricing practices that, if successful, would have forced our client to overhaul its operations.
- Defending an insurer in putative life insurance class action seeking to revive lapsed policies based on claim that it did not comply with certain California statutes regarding notices to designees.
Recent representations include:
- Secured a unanimous United States Supreme Court decision holding that an insurer with financial responsibility for bankruptcy claims is a “party in interest” under the Bankruptcy Code that has a right to participate in bankruptcy reorganization proceedings.
- Secured California Court of Appeal victory in State Farm v. Lara, an important decision regarding the prior-approval regime that held that the insurance commissioner could not impose retroactive rates and order premium refunds.
- Obtained a significant Ninth Circuit victory in a case touted as “easily the most important health insurance decision of the last 25 years,” involving challenges to guidelines that our client used to make coverage determinations.
- Won a unanimous appellate victory from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit in a closely watched coverage case involving wind-driven rain in the Pacific Northwest.
- Won a published California Court of Appeal decision dismissing a class action alleging insurers unlawfully accessed a computer database containing confidential heath information. Previously won Ninth Circuit affirmance of federal court dismissal of similar allegations under the Stored Communication Act.
- Won a published Oklahoma Supreme Court decision for the member company of a finance and insurance corporation in an early state Supreme Court COVID-19 insurance appeal.
Practice Leaders
News & Insights
Client Alert
California Supreme Court Holds That An Insured Can Access Its First-Level Excess Policy After Exhausting Only The Underlying Primary Insurance For That Policy Period
Client Alert
Supreme Court Holds That Insurers With Financial Responsibility For Bankruptcy Claims May Be Heard In Reorganization Proceedings
Client Alert
Texas Supreme Court Allows Claimant to Sue Insurers Directly After Settlement, But Holds Settlement Agreement Does Not Bind Insurers